THE INFALLIBLE WORD OF GOD.g
There is, so far, no error in the King James Bible. This is by test, not by’faith’ A Concordance, available from Christian bookshops, is helpful to prove this. The Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance, from the US about 1900, has a numbering system that has become the centre of all ancient Hebrew and greek scholarship, so that one does not need to comprehend Hebrew, but one can quote the word’s number in the Strong’s dictionaries only to discuss the Hebrew word. And so for thee Ancient Greeek also. The Young’s Analytical Concordance , from the UK 1877, classifies words according to the greek or Hebrew. and is excellent.
When usuing these concordances, several apparently contradictory texts or contradictions, unravel.
So far I, and others, have found no error in the KJV. Most of the examples were taught me by the group I was in, some were shown me by the Holy Spirit. Praise Jehovah, more correctly, YHWH.
errors could be * concerning numbers,e.g. 7 or 8.
*expressions in Hebrew .
* and due to CARELESS reading.
— most are due to careless reading.
For example, Solomon had 40,000 stalls of horses for his chariots
and ,Solomon had 4,000 stalls for chariots and horses.
Please note here that the first speaks of stalls of horses,
while the second speaks of stalls for chariots.
they both show solomon’s wealth and blessing from YHWH, but are two
differeren t aspects of his wealth ( from God). and these two statements
are both true and do not contain a ‘contradiction’. The Praise to whoever
ultimately wrote and translated the bible (KJV) in which is no error,
2Samuel 8:4 and 1 Chronicles 18:4.nd David took from him a thousand chariots
seven hundred horsemen and twenty thousand footmen.
The second goes, And David took from him a thousand .., seven thousand horsemen and twenty thousand footmen.
Usuing a Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance available from Christian bookshops, the word for seven, means , full, as the sacred full one, a week etc., Number 7651 in the Hebrew dictionary (at back), and is derived from Number 7650 which means to be complete, to swear, etc. The word for thousand , Number 505 and 504, also means yoking, taming, etc. Therefore seven thousand could also mean full yoking. David ,therefore fully tamed, Hadadrezer’s 700 horsemen. Or, he ” seven thousand-ed” hadadrezer’s 700 horsemen and this is nothing but Hebrew expression and not an ‘error’ . The praise to the author of the KING JAMES BIBLE. the preserver of it and the spread of it! and it is no effort to Him to make a book without error.
There is a good list of ‘bible errors’ on
freethought debater.com. I’ve left several answers there for moderation.
but two have been allowed through (to the site). All the examples there are not
‘errors and contradictions’ as claimed. ‘ It would be
a good exercise for any visitor here, to do some exercises there. I
await if they will moderate the comments I’ve left (for weeks).
By the Grace of God, JEHOVAH, Yahuwah , YHWH in Hebrew writing, there is so far
NO error in the KING JAMES. Praise to Him! or, if any is found please leave it
here .. I will attempt to answer, by His Grace only. God Bless!
PS 21. 7.’17
they have removed
all the claimed errots
from that US atheist
site , at end of 2016
It seems they or he
does not believe he
can prove any error in
the King James Bible
,,despite all thheir
like another victory
fot the God of
Israel and the
King James! and
by His mercy, less
false claims for the
the hare. Leviticus 11.
According to the dictionary, chew the cud means to ascend while
rechewing. In the case of e.g. cows, they would bring up food from one
stomach , rechew it and then swallow it into another stomach. The
hare re-chews ( pellets of) it’s stools.. According to Colliers Encyclopedia, the
hare “usually moves uphill” while rechewing its stool pellets! That
is, the hare usually ascends while re-chewing or” chews the cud”.
the hare does not divide the hoof. Leviticus 11.
The correct context of this revelation is given in Deuteronomy
14, where it says, the hare does not divide the hoof
in two. (See
Isaiah 28:9,10. for the rule of biblical interpretation).
And the anger of the LORD against Israel , and he moved
David against them to say, Go, number Israel and Judah.
And s…. stood up ……to tempt david to number Israel.
— 1Chronicles 21:1.
It appears that YHWH did it, But S.. did it , as 1 Chronicles states that
s.. did it. Theologically, elsewhere it is also so suggested in the
Scripture, but the Scripture reveals that YHWH does not need himself
to do anything of a negative nature. If YHWH withdraws His saving Grace,
the enemy steps in and does the evil . So both statements are
correct—- YHWH (Jehovah or Yahuwah) withdrew his
Grace…….. and the enemy stepped in and did the
(negative work) here, of provoking David to
number Israel.. And both statements are ,therefore,
quite correct. [ AS to why should the loving God ever remove
His Saving Grace in any situation at any time, the
answer is because of sin.]
A king was eighteen years old when he began to reign Another text in the Hebrew old covenant states he was eight years of age when he began to reign So was it 8 or 18?
It was both, because the STRONG’s Concordance, available from Christian bookshops, gives the number for the word eight as # 8083 In the Hebrew dictionary at the back And the word means ~surplus~ as above the perfect seven . So the king was of surplus or eighteen years when he began to reign. It also means plumpness, eighth and eight. QED